Five key findings from Bain’s 2017 Private Equity Report

Apr 2017 by Caroline Rasmussen

Each year global consultancy Bain issues a comprehensive, state-of-the-industry report on private equity, which has become required reading for most investors in the asset class. Below, we’ve highlighted five key findings from the report, which speak to the continuing appeal of the asset class, the importance of selecting the right managers and the emergence of tech as arguably the strongest sector for private equity.

1. Private equity returns had another strong showing, continuing to outperform public markets by a meaningful gap over both short-term and long-term time horizons.1

Using the modified public market equivalent (mPME) metric, which replicates the timing and size of PE cash flows as if they had been invested in public equities in order to directly compare private and public equity returns over defined time periods, every region saw outperformance by buyout funds for the 12 months ending June 2016. As we’ve noted before however, short term measurements do not capture the effect of private equity value creation, which due to its intensive operational nature requires several years to fully manifest in valuations. Private equity showed sustained outperformance over longer time periods, returning 11% compared to 8% for the S&P over the past 10 years and providing investors with a 5% illiquidity premium vs the S&P over the last 20 years. Outperformance was even stronger in Europe and Asia.

Bain's 2017 Private Equity Report Fig 1.21

2. Investors’ private equity programs have been cash flow positive for six years running.

Globally, PE fund distributions (the return of investors’ original capital plus any gains) have exceeded contributions each year since 2011. In other words, exit conditions have been so robust over the past several years that proceeds from the sale of private equity-owned companies have surpassed the combined capital put to work in new investments plus the increase in valuations of existing portfolio assets. The ratio of distributions to contributions stood at 1.9 for the first half of 2016, meaning that for every $1 investors put to work nearly $2 came back, allowing their PE allocations to become self-funding by a significant margin.

Bain's 2017 Private Equity Report Fig 1.10

3. Companies have increasingly been able to fuel their growth with private capital, rather than tapping the public markets.

Raising capital from private investors has been possible at about the same, or arguably better, valuations than the public markets have been offering in recent years. 2 As a result, dual-track processes have become more common, with many private equity managers preparing IPOs for portfolio companies while simultaneously exploring a private sale of the asset. To provide an example, cybersecurity company Blue Coat dual tracked IPO and private sale processes last year, ultimately electing to be acquired by private company Symantec for $4.65 billion just two weeks after filing for an IPO3. The certainty and speed of a sale to a strategic buyer or to another financial sponsor often are more attractive than a public offering for PE fund sponsors seeking an exit, especially in times of volatility. Given the sizeable swings in public markets over 2016, it is unsurprising that the count and value of IPOs sank relative to 2015, dropping by 40% and 48% respectively.

Bain's 2017 Private Equity Report Fig 1.6

4. Tech deals continue to stand out with strong fundamentals, despite high valuations.

Bain compared the five largest software public-to-private deals closed during 2015 and 2016 with the five largest non-tech deals, and found that the average price-to-EBITDA multiple for the software deals was 18.1 vs. 10.2 for the non-tech deals. Despite these high valuations, there are good reasons why tech deals have traded at a premium:

• Tech-focused companies tend to generate stronger revenue growth. Over the five years preceding acquisition, the five largest software public-to-private deals in 2015 and 2016 had average annual revenue growth of 22.6% vs. just 5.7% for the nontech deals. Looking ahead, more and more corporate spending is slated for IT and digital projects. In addition, many software providers benefit from strong customer loyalty, creating an opportunity to raise prices over time. Finally, many enterprise applications are still penetrating their markets, so there is room for new customer growth.
• Tech assets typically deliver high free cash flow conversion, particularly in software and tech-enabled services, which account for roughly 80% of technology deals by count and value.
• Providers in these industries enjoy relatively recession-resistant recurring revenue streams, as customers often view their products as critical systems that are used daily in their core businesses. The premium on technology’s valuations has risen in recent years as the economic cycle has grown longer in the tooth. 
• Recent tech deals have outperformed those in many other industries. Return multiples for software deals have been higher, and fewer deals have suffered from capital impairment, as shown in the chart below.

Bain's 2017 Private Equity Report Fig 1.26

5. While the interquartile spread in private equity has begun to narrow, the best funds continue to outperform both the public markets and their peers by a wide margin.

The spread between top and bottom quartile private equity funds has narrowed slightly in recent years but remains at about 10%, demonstrating the critical importance of picking the right managers4 . Looking over the past three decades, top-quartile funds exhibited two consistent characteristics, achieved by employing higher quality due diligence and post-acquisition value creation processes:

• Lower rates of capital impairment. Top-quartile funds had 20% of their deals experience capital impairment and an additional 6% of deals fully written off, about half the levels of bottom-quartile funds.
• More homeruns. Top-quartile funds reaped more than 5x capital invested on 13% of their deals, compared with just 2% of deals for bottom-quartile funds.

Bain's 2017 Private Equity Report Fig 1.22


(1) Past performance does not guarantee future results. While investments in private equity funds provide potential for attractive returns, they also present significant risks not typically present in public equity markets, including, but not limited to, illiquidity, long term horizons, loss of capital and significant execution and operating risks.



(4) Cambridge Associates, US Private Equity: Since Inception IRR & Multiples by Fund Vintage Year, 9/30/2016.


While private equity funds provide the potential for attractive returns, they also have features and risks not typically present in public equity markets, including, but not limited to:

  • Investment will be illiquid for a period of time, which means it cannot be sold, transferred or redeemed at will or for reasons of hardship
  • The manager’s investment strategy may not be fully or successfully implemented as intended
  • There may be significant execution and operating risks that could negatively impact the fund and its investors
  • Part or all of the principal investment may be at risk or lost
  • Past performance is not an indication of future results


    These materials are for informational purposes only and are not intended as, and may not be relied on in any manner as legal, tax or investment advice, a recommendation, or as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to purchase or a recommendation of any interest in any fund or security described herein. Any such offer or solicitation shall be made only pursuant to the final confidential offering documents which will contain information about each fund’s investment objectives and terms and conditions of an investment and may also describe certain risks and tax information related to an investment therein.

    Past performance is not indicative of future results. Private equity funds are typically private placements sold only to qualified clients through transactions that are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder (“Private Placements”). An investment in any product issued pursuant to a Private Placement, such as the funds described, entails a high degree of risk and no assurance can be given that any alternative investment fund’s investment objectives will be achieved or that investors will receive a return of their capital. Further, such investments are not subject to the same levels of regulatory scrutiny as publicly listed investments, and as a result, investors may have access to significantly less information than they can access with respect to publicly listed investments. Prospective investors should also note that investments in the products described involve long lock-ups and do not provide investors with liquidity.

    The information contained herein is subject to change and is also incomplete. This industry information and its importance is an opinion only and should not be relied upon as the only important information available. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

    Securities may be offered through iCapital Securities, LLC, a registered broker dealer, member of FINRA and SIPC and subsidiary of Institutional Capital Network, Inc. iCapital Advisors, LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor, may be the general partner or investment advisor of some iCapital offered funds. These registrations and memberships in no way imply that the SEC, FINRA or SIPC have endorsed the entities, products or services discussed herein. iCapital is a registered trademark of Institutional Capital Network, Inc. Additional information is available upon request.