One of the more compelling value propositions of the private equity industry is the strong alignment of interests between general partners (GPs) who manage funds and limited partners (LPs) who invest. A key driver of this alignment is carried interest, or the performance-based incentive fee that GPs collect, which usually represents 20% of profits generated by a fund.

One of the more compelling value propositions of the private equity industry is the strong alignment of interests between general partners (GPs) who manage funds and limited partners (LPs) who invest. A key driver of this alignment is carried interest, or the performance-based incentive fee that GPs collect, which usually represents 20% of profits generated by a fund. Unlike other asset classes, where managers may only collect fees as a percentage of assets under management, private equity managers have an added incentive to deliver strong performance rather than simply gather assets.


Most private equity funds set their ‘hurdle rate’ or preferred return at around 8%, though this may vary depending on the fund’s strategy. This means the fund manager must generate an annualized net return of at least 8% for investors before the manager can share in any of the profits.

In an asset class where investors typically expect net performance of around 15%-20%, the preferred return is a critical tool to ensure that managers achieve a prespecified baseline return before they can collect incentive compensation.

However, it is important for investors to properly assess a private equity fund’s waterfall, or the allocation of distributions between the GP and LPs, in order to ensure proper alignment of interests. There are four primary components to a distribution waterfall:

1. RETURN OF CAPITAL: 100% of a fund’s proceeds are distributed to investors until they have received an amount equal to the total amount they have invested.

2. PREFERRED RETURN: Investors continue to receive 100% of fund proceeds until the fund has achieved its preferred return, or hurdle rate, as defined in the fund’s offering documents. While the typical preferred return in private equity is 8%, it is often 6% in the case of private credit funds, which usually have lower target returns than buyout funds.

3. GP CATCH-UP: Once a fund has returned all contributions to investors and reached its preferred return, the GP is then able to begin collecting carried interest, which is calculated by going back to the first dollar of profits generated by the fund. In order to recoup the GP’s share of returns accrued prior to reaching the hurdle rate, most managers include a GP catch-up provision, which allows a manager to retain most of a fund’s profits (often 80%) until it has received its stated share of the gains.

4. REMAINING DISTRIBUTIONS: After the manager is “caught-up” and has received its incentive for fund returns beyond the hurdle rate, all remaining proceeds are then allocated between LPs and the GP at the specified rate (typically 80%/20%, respectively).


A well-designed waterfall can be a benefit for LPs, as it creates strong alignment and properly incentivizes the manager to optimize returns.


While these four components are relatively standard across most private equity funds, there are variations on how a GP may implement its waterfall. The most common variations are the European waterfall and the American waterfall (please note that the designation of European vs. American refers to the way that the waterfall is structured, not the geographical location of the manager). Under a European waterfall structure (described above) carried interest is calculated at the fund-level across all deals. In this situation, the GP does not begin to take carried interest until the fund has returned all LP contributions across all deals, and delivered the preferred return.

By contrast, an American waterfall is calculated on a deal-by-deal basis, where GPs are compensated for each successful deal. This often allows the GP to begin taking a share of the profits or carried interest earlier in the life of a fund. In some cases, this can alter a GPs behavior, as collecting carry on a few large, successful deals early on may reduce their incentive to optimize performance later in a fund’s life. An American waterfall also can result in a GP receiving carried interest on a fund that is underperforming its hurdle rate, provided that there are individual deals that have outperformed the preferred return. Almost all funds that utilize an American waterfall include a clawback provision, which allows investors to recoup the carried interest at the end of a fund’s life if the fund underperformed and the GP collected more than its share of the fund’s profits. European waterfalls are more favorable for investors because they delay the payment of carried interest and prevent GPs from collecting incentive compensation on funds that underperform.


‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎

EUROPEAN WATERFALL: Performance is measured versus the hurdle rate at the fund level.

AMERICAN WATERFALL: Performance is measured versus the hurdle rate on a deal by deal basis.

‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎


‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎

Due to the somewhat complex nature of waterfalls, investors should carefully examine a fund’s terms to understand how carried interest is paid. This is particularly true in today’s fundraising environment, as robust investor demand for private equity has allowed managers to include less investor-friendly provisions in their terms. According to the latest edition of MJ Hudson’s Private Equity Fund Terms Research, 23% of funds raised this year have dropped the hurdle rate altogether from their initial terms. This figure is up from 12% in 2018 and 15% in 2017, though it should be noted that 86% of buyout funds surveyed still use an 8% hurdle rate. Additionally, only 27% of U.S.-based managers surveyed utilize a European waterfall (compared to 88% of European GPs).

It is important that the waterfall structure is designed to appropriately balance the needs of both the investor and the manager to maximize the alignment of interests between all parties involved. A well-designed waterfall can be a benefit for LPs, as it creates strong alignment and properly incentivizes the manager to optimize returns. When a fund is performing well, fund managers reap the benefits along with their investors.

Was this article helpful?
YesNo

Important Information / Disclaimer

This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as, and may not be relied on in any manner as legal, tax or investment advice, a recommendation, or as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to purchase or a recommendation of any interest in any fund or security offered by iCapital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Alternative investments are complex, speculative investment vehicles and are not suitable for all investors. An investment in an alternative investment entails a high degree of risk and no assurance can be given that any alternative investment fund’s investment objectives will be achieved or that investors will receive a return of their capital. The information contained herein is subject to change and is also incomplete. This industry information and its importance is an opinion only and should not be relied upon as the only important information available. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed, and iCapital Network assumes no liability for the information provided.

This information is the property of iCapital Network. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Products offered by iCapital are typically private placements that are sold only to qualified clients of iCapital through transactions that are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder (“Private Placements”). An investment in any product issued pursuant to a Private Placement, such as the funds described, entails a high degree of risk and no assurance can be given that any alternative investment fund’s investment objectives will be achieved or that investors will receive a return of their capital. Further, such investments are not subject to the same levels of regulatory scrutiny as publicly listed investments, and as a result, investors may have access to significantly less information than they can access with respect to publicly listed investments. Prospective investors should also note that investments in the products described involve long lock-ups and do not provide investors with liquidity.

Securities may be offered through iCapital Securities, LLC, a registered broker dealer, member of FINRA and SIPC and subsidiary of Institutional Capital Network, Inc. (d/b/a iCapital Network). These registrations and memberships in no way imply that the SEC, FINRA or SIPC have endorsed the entities, products or services discussed herein. iCapital and iCapital Network are registered trademarks of Institutional Capital Network, Inc. Additional information is available upon request.

© 2019 Institutional Capital Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Dan Fletcher

Dan Fletcher

Dan is an Assistant VP on the Research & Diligence team at iCapital, where he focuses on manager selection and due diligence. Prior to joining iCapital, Dan was an Investment Analyst at Performance Equity Management, where he performed diligence on private equity managers across a number of strategies and evaluated potential co-investments. He also previously worked in the investment consulting group at Aon Hewitt, conducting analysis on the investment portfolios of large institutional clients. Dan is a member of the CFA Institute and received a B.A. in Economics and Psychology from Bucknell University.

Kunal Shah

Kunal Shah

Kunal is Managing Director and Head of Private Equity Solutions at iCapital, focused on the identification, selection and due diligence of private equity funds to be offered on the Flagship Platform. Previously, Kunal was a Principal in the private markets group at Meketa Investment Group, a leading global investment consultant serving pensions funds, endowments and foundations, and family offices. He received a BS in Business Administration with a concentration in Finance from Drexel University. See Full Bio.